🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 268+ reviews
Toys βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage Original Tinkertoy set no. 136

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (268 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$24
$40
Sale
βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Several years old. Good condition.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Original Tinkertoy set no. 136

Several years old. Good condition.​

This product is magnificent for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 31437

Category: Toys > Building Toys > Building Kit Accessories

Original Price: $40 USD

Sale Price: $24 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7301 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely exceptional
Personally, the Vintage Original Tinkertoy set no. 136 works fine and I’m satisfied.
32 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
From my experience, it is hassle-no-cost to use which is good enough.
40 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
The Vintage Original Tinkertoy set no. 136 feels premium for the cost.
24 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have​
Solid Vintage Original Tinkertoy set no. 136. Does its job.
7 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly impressed
For the price, the Vintage Original Tinkertoy set no. 136 performs as expected and it’s fine overall.
33 people found this helpful